Executed numerical reference study

Sampling chamber

Completed virtual bench

29 checks; 162 dimensional/operating cases; six coupled response cases; three slow-wall refinement runs; four selected-design corners plus refined worst corner; 20 synthetic instrument readings.

Read the synthetic acceptance results and methods. The supplement records adverse outcomes as well as passing cases.

The original comparison below is retained as baseline evidence. The final selection is the 2.525 mm-radius tolerance-allowance CAD and the 600 s virtual-fixture flush decision in the supplement.

Reference result

The 0.5 mm radial-clearance reference chamber replaces 99% of its initial tracer mass in 50.93 s, with 6.785 Pa modeled pressure loss. It is the smallest declared clearance; no claim is made that a smaller gap is manufacturable or appropriate for a real probe.

Computed comparison

chamber radius mmradial clearance mmvolume mm3residence time spressure Pat99 whole st99 probe st99 outlet sflush volume whole mm3pressure pass
2.50.5141.371728.27436.78550.927939.583860.9967254.6394True
31314.159362.83190.7619130.8675106.5055154.7697654.3376True
42753.9822150.79640.079362.1003294.6016421.06541810.5017True

Model and measurements

The fixed probe has 2 mm radius and occupies the full 20 mm chamber length. The three chambers have uniform outer radii of 2.5, 3 and 4 mm. An axisymmetric Stokes FEM determines pressure and the axial velocity. The velocity is integrated into annular face fluxes; a tiny normalization enforces the declared flow exactly in the transport mesh. The scalar solver uses mass-form finite volumes, upwind axial advection, centered molecular diffusion and backward Euler. Internal face fluxes cancel; outflow accumulated at each implicit step is compared with mass remaining.

The old-sample fraction starts at one throughout. Incoming fluid has zero old tracer. Diffusive flux is zero at the ends and both walls. The probe metric averages the liquid from z=8 to 12 mm and from r=2 to 2.2 mm, with partial-cell volume weights. Outlet concentration is flow-weighted, while whole-chamber concentration is volume-weighted. t99 is the first interpolated crossing below 0.01.

Refinement and verification

checkpassedvaluelimit
2.5 mm annulus pressure benchmarkTrue1.844085717461752e-08relative pressure error < 2e-5
2.5 mm creeping-flow regimeTrue0.07073553026306459Re < 0.1
2.5 mm spatial refinementTrue0.02017197635615897maximum medium-to-fine t99 change < 4%
2.5 mm time refinementTrue0.012325079588729526maximum t99 change from halving dt < 2%
2.5 mm tracer mass balanceTrue7.237528875152536e-15relative initial mass error < 1e-9
2.5 mm tracer positivityTrue5.248981356793106e-37minimum concentration >= -1e-12
2.5 mm tracer upper boundTrue1.0000000000000038maximum concentration <= 1+1e-12
2.5 mm FEM-to-cell flux transferTrue5.134959302210973e-07flux normalization correction < 1e-5
3 mm annulus pressure benchmarkTrue5.79637646769271e-08relative pressure error < 2e-5
3 mm creeping-flow regimeTrue0.06366197723675814Re < 0.1
3 mm spatial refinementTrue0.020103600637870533maximum medium-to-fine t99 change < 4%
3 mm time refinementTrue0.005065248394893196maximum t99 change from halving dt < 2%
3 mm tracer mass balanceTrue4.704393768849149e-15relative initial mass error < 1e-9
3 mm tracer positivityTrue4.6873989073637536e-37minimum concentration >= -1e-12
3 mm tracer upper boundTrue1.0000000000000062maximum concentration <= 1+1e-12
3 mm FEM-to-cell flux transferTrue5.154748532465447e-07flux normalization correction < 1e-5
4 mm annulus pressure benchmarkTrue1.6965606008945144e-07relative pressure error < 2e-5
4 mm creeping-flow regimeTrue0.05305164769729845Re < 0.1
4 mm spatial refinementTrue0.01808600994572107maximum medium-to-fine t99 change < 4%
4 mm time refinementTrue0.0019243453726162096maximum t99 change from halving dt < 2%
4 mm tracer mass balanceTrue6.785183320455503e-15relative initial mass error < 1e-9
4 mm tracer positivityTrue8.722261628111456e-36minimum concentration >= -1e-12
4 mm tracer upper boundTrue1.0000000000000113maximum concentration <= 1+1e-12
4 mm FEM-to-cell flux transferTrue4.256420818027351e-07flux normalization correction < 1e-5
Three nominal CAD chamber solidsTrue3.0three valid body/probe solids, volume matched analytically
Seven regression testsTrue0.0exit 0

Interpretation

First-order upwinding and backward Euler smear the front. The separate space and time studies quantify the remaining t99 sensitivity for this input set; these are not exact analytical washout solutions. The numerical ranking is stable across the tested refinements. The outlet metric clears later than the probe-region metric in these straight annuli. A bypass cavity could reverse that behavior, but no such cavity is included here.

Limits and experiment

Fluid viscosity and diffusivity are reference inputs, not measured properties. The model excludes fittings, expansion chambers, asymmetric probe heads, trapped gas, adsorption and sensor chemistry. The CAD bodies do not include seals, mounting or pressure-vessel qualification. See flush-test.md for an unperformed physical comparison procedure.

Sources

The three metrics use the same passive-tracer step and flow.
The three metrics use the same passive-tracer step and flow.
Spatial sensitivity and pressure tradeoff.
Spatial sensitivity and pressure tradeoff.
Computed old-sample washout in the selected annulus.
Computed old-sample washout in the selected annulus.
Reference geometry and the dashed near-probe measurement region.
Reference geometry and the dashed near-probe measurement region.

Run instructions ยท Verification record